A Modal Logic for Beliefs and Pro Attitudes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Agents’ pro attitudes such as goals, intentions, desires, wishes, and judgements of satisfactoriness play an important role in how agents act rationally. To provide a natural and satisfying formalization of these attitudes is a longstanding problem in the community of agent theory. Most of existing modal logic approaches are based on Kripke structures and have to face the so-called side-effect problem. This paper presents a new modal logic formalizing agents’ pro attitudes, based on neighborhood models. There are three distinguishing features of this logic. Firstly, this logic naturally satisfies Bratman’s requirements for agents’ beliefs and pro attitudes, as well as some interesting properties that have not been discussed before. Secondly, we give a sound and complete axiom system for characterizing all the valid properties of beliefs and pro attitudes. We introduce for the first time the notion of linear neighborhood frame for obtaining the semantic model, and this brings a new member to the family of non-normal modal logics. Finally, we argue that the present logic satisfies an important requirement proposed from the viewpoint of computation, that is, computational grounding, which means that properties in this logic can be given an interpretation in terms of some concrete computational model. Indeed, the presented neighborhood frame can be naturally derived from probabilistic programming with utilities.
منابع مشابه
Walking the Walk: Do Green Beliefs Translate Into Green Travel Behavior?
In response to the threat of climate change, there is a rising tide of “green” ideas and beliefs. However, it is open to question as to whether these pro-environment attitudes actually translate into environmentally-friendly behavior. We develop a set of novel measures of community environmentalism for both the state of California and the nation as a whole based on costly behavior in both polit...
متن کاملA Logical Theory of Static Reasoning for Rational Agents
A formal language to describe mental states of rational agents is useful to specify the behavior of artiicial agents that are supposed to act intelligently and to help human beings in evaluating their reasoning about the external environment. This paper presents a multi-agent, propositional, temporal logic to describe the mental state of rational agents. The formal properties of beliefs and int...
متن کاملLogic of change, change of logic
Understanding human behaviour, and indeed human beings more generally, requires an understanding of their attitudes: their beliefs, desires and preferences of course, but also a plethora of other attitudes or attitudinal factors, such as their presuppositions, their assumptions, their intentions, their attention, their awareness and their emotional states. But people’s attitudes change over tim...
متن کاملBelief Revision in a changing World
Introduction. Several authors (Keller and Winslett 1985, Winslett 1988, Katsuno and Mendelzon 1989, Morreau and Rott 1991) have recently argued for a distinction in the way beliefs are updated with new information. They distinguish between information that teUs the agent that the world has changed over time and information that fills in or corrects the agent's picture of the world at a particul...
متن کاملA defeasible logic for modelling policy-based intentions and motivational attitudes
In this paper we show how defeasible logic could formally account for the non-monotonic properties involved in motivational attitudes like intention and obligation. Usually, normal modal operators are used to represent such attitudes wherein classical logical consequence and the rule of necessitation comes into play, i.e., ` A/ ` 2A, that is from ` A derive ` 2A. This means that such formalisms...
متن کامل